<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble With Being God by William Aicher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selfpublishingreview.com/blog/2009/05/04/the-trouble-with-being-god-by-william-aicher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selfpublishingreview.com/blog/2009/05/04/the-trouble-with-being-god-by-william-aicher/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:57:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brent Robison</title>
		<link>http://www.selfpublishingreview.com/blog/2009/05/04/the-trouble-with-being-god-by-william-aicher/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Robison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selfpublishingreview.com/?p=1866#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Henry, I enjoyed this review.  You may share some of my interests: the intersection of literary with philosphical, or commercial with spiritual, in the world of fiction.  I agree that one does not accomplish delivery of philosophical truths by simply having characters spout them.  And thank you for pointing out the oft-seen fallacy: &quot;I feel hurt by (angry at) you believers so I reject what you believe in.&quot;  I explore that idea a bit in at least one of my short stories.

I admit I haven&#039;t read Aicher&#039;s book, but it seems unfortunate to align atheism (a label too fraught with misinterpretation) with cruelty, bleakness, dysfunctional relationships, violence.  Especially if you&#039;re trying to make a pro-atheism statement.

Looking forward to reading more of your reviews--

BR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry, I enjoyed this review.  You may share some of my interests: the intersection of literary with philosphical, or commercial with spiritual, in the world of fiction.  I agree that one does not accomplish delivery of philosophical truths by simply having characters spout them.  And thank you for pointing out the oft-seen fallacy: &#8220;I feel hurt by (angry at) you believers so I reject what you believe in.&#8221;  I explore that idea a bit in at least one of my short stories.</p>
<p>I admit I haven&#8217;t read Aicher&#8217;s book, but it seems unfortunate to align atheism (a label too fraught with misinterpretation) with cruelty, bleakness, dysfunctional relationships, violence.  Especially if you&#8217;re trying to make a pro-atheism statement.</p>
<p>Looking forward to reading more of your reviews&#8211;</p>
<p>BR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
