Features

There’s a lot of interesting discussion about self-publishing going on in the blogosphere, beginning with Victoria Strauss who writes for the Writer Beware blog.  She calls out a recent article on CNN that paints too rosy a picture of self-publishing.  Not revealing, for instance, that a successful self-publisher also had a high-powered PR firm working for her.  I would argue this is the case with a lot of journalism in general – it errs on the side of being overly positive.  That’s the nature of the puff piece.

But she’s right, in a way.  Self-publishing is not yet a replacement […]

Crossposted from Christopher Meeks’ blog at Red Room.  Read Self Publishing Review’s interview with Chris Meeks and a review of his novel, The Brightest Moon of the Century.

Advertising Age wrote last week, “Amid 23% population growth in the past two decades, U.S. newspaper circulation has dropped 20% –one reason your morning paper, downsized every which way, is no match for a stiff breeze. Craigslist, siphoning off $7 billion worth of classifieds, is another.”

I then read in the New York Times on Friday that the Times, which owns the Boston Globe, has threatened to close the […]

Via the Podler, there’s a fairly contentious post on Mrs. Giggles on the state of self-published book reviewing, stating that self-publishing reviewers are too complementary – unrealistically so – without enough of a critical eye.  She singles out Pod Peep and Podbram for being the best self-publishing review sites out there.

I agree with her to some degree, but I feel that self-publishing is a different animal than traditional publishing.  Given the fact that self-publishers are facing an uphill battle to find readers and distribution, it doesn’t entirely make sense to write negative reviews.  So, like the old Poddy […]

“I’m a reader, I have identified a book that I would like to read, and I want it now.”

Throughout most of the centuries that manuscripts have been set in type and bound into books, the sequence of thoughts expressed above would have framed an immense impossibility. Books were far away and difficult to find. In the twentieth-century, the spread of libraries and corner book stores brought books closer to us, and by the 1940s drugstores and groceries began to offer racks of paperbacks. The system worked best in cities and towns, not so well in isolated rural communities. Even […]

There’s an interesting comment by Nathan Bransford at the end of the epic On Agents and Editors thread.  He says,

I think what you mean is that authors and publishers should take a chance on writers they believe in and hope the public gradually catches on over the course of many books. I agree with that, and sometimes this works out. But you can blame (in part) bookstore chains for this disappearance. With few exceptions they base their orders strictly on what the last book sold. It’s incredibly hard to get them to stock and promote an author whose first

I’m gearing up to finish and release my novel.  Note: anyone waiting for reviews, sorry for the extra delay, as I’ve got a lot on my plate right now, revising my novel and putting it together.  I’m still reading and reviewing, just not as quickly.

My cover designer has come up with two different covers.  I’m not going to give a synopsis because I’m curious what people think on a basic browsing-on-the-internet level.  Please vote below.

The interview with Nathan Bransford @ Alan Rinzler’s blog has a couple of very fascinating comments. The first is a comment from someone who goes by AE, without a link to a homepage:

The statement about agents becoming the tastemakers is hopeful, at best, and obviously smeared in self interest. No agent wants to accept their demise. What is more likely is that editors will simply band together and form a brand of their own and through this brand the electronic works will be siphoned and accordingly, stamped with approval.

This is inevitable because the publishing houses will disappear as