Home / Features / It's Hard Out There for Everyone

It's Hard Out There for Everyone

One thing that is lost in the self-publishing/traditional publishing debate is just how hard it is to sell any kind of book.  It’s as if pointing out that it’s difficult to sell self-published books, it implies it’s easy to sell traditionally-published books.  It’s not – it’s hard to sell everything.  One of the criticisms of self-publishing is people saying, “But self-publishers need to market all the time! When is there time to write???”  Unless you’re Dan Brown, or some other high-profile writer, most writers have to spend a whole lot of time marketing.

This could be an argument against self-publishing: if it’s so hard to sell a traditionally published book, why even both self-publishing, as it’s a potentially futile exercise.  You won’t get a lot of argument from me there: it’s true, selling self-published books is hard.  But so is getting traditionally published – precisely because it’s so hard to sell books, they look more towards those books that are more likely to sell more easily.

What it comes down to, though, is that we’re all in the same boat.  This whole debate should be us vs. them, but how in the hell can we get people to read more.  A post at Digital Book World about the Rick Moody Twitter experiment (he posted a story in installments on Twitter) is particularly telling about how hard it is for all publishers and bookstore owners, not just us lowly self-publishers.  The post links to another post by the manager of Vroman’s bookstore where he says:

The Moody Twitter experiment (and Moody wasn’t to blame for its failure, though I’m sure the first couple comments will be “ZOMG!1! Rick Moody is teh suck!1!!1?) depressed me for a number of reasons.  First, it made me wonder what we’re all doing on Twitter.  If so many of my followers are book industry people, am I wasting my time with it?  All this time, I’d hoped I was reaching customers.  To be sure, Twitter is useful for talking to colleagues in the book industry, and I’ll continue to use it for that purpose, but if it doesn’t have a reach beyond that, I’m not sure what the point is.  So much of the dialog that happens on Twitter and on the literary blogs feels masturbatory to me.  It’s the same couple hundred people talking about the same issues to the same audience.  Is that what I’ve been doing these past few years?  Is that what the book business is at this point?  If it is, then to quote the modern day philosopher Bunk Moreland “We ain’t about much.”

The book business is in major decline, and while we can all howl about the reasons why, the main one, it seems to me, is that not enough people read (and those who do, read less than they used to).  There are more ways than ever to get your entertainment and information, and books are having a lot of trouble keeping up.  Those of us who rely on selling books for a living need to devote a lot of time to finding people who are not readers.  We have to grow our market, or we are in for a very dark future indeed.   The reaction to this Twitter experiment seems to indicate to me that we’re not all that interested in doing it.  Or maybe we are, as long as it doesn’t interrupt our conversations about ebook formatting and the National Book Awards.

In other words, those at the top of the literary food chain – a major retailer like Vroman’s, where a self-publisher might dream of a book being housed – are having as much trouble unloading books as self-publishers themselves.  And just like a site like this might be an echo chamber of self-publishers reading about other self-publishers and possibly not buying anything, the same thing is occurring for everyone.

Which is one reason why the traditional publishing vs. self-publishing debate is so stupid.  We’re all trying to get people to buy our books.  There’s a lot traditionally published writers and sellers can learn from the sometimes-innovative approaches of self-publishers and vice versa.  Reading is on decline just as – somehow – there are more books being produced than ever.  I guess writers aren’t very voracious book buyers.  But basically, we’re all trying to reach readers in our own way in a very difficult environment, so criticizing self-publishing as the means of production should be the least of people’s worries – it should moreso be about how to make reading attractive to a new generation of readers.

Some might say that self-publishing dilutes the field even further by introducing books to people that should never be read and so turn them off of reading.  Possibly – but on the flipside, the possibility of being able to publish your own book could also make reading and writing more attractive to a new generation of readers. To me, that outweighs the former by a lot.

I read recently (can’t remember where) that McSweeney’s considers it a success to sell 3000 books of an edition.  McSWEENEY’S – a publisher that can get books reviewed most anywhere and has a huge built-in fan base.  That should tell you the state of bookselling.  The problem isn’t that it’s hard to sell self-published books.  The problem is that it’s hard to sell books.  Period.

  • http://www.thebookdesigner.com Joel Friedlander

    “Which is one reason why the traditional publishing vs. self-publishing debate is so stupid. We’re all trying to get people to buy our books.”

    Have to agree with that, Henry. A lot of wasted time, energy, rhetoric and good will over a pointless debate. The level of animosity can be startling. Maybe we should celebrate that there are so many ways to get to print, that book publishing has been democratized as much as it has, that the possibility of ebooks may generate a flowering of literature (hey, it could happen)…

    Maybe we should just all get together and gang up on the real bloodsuckers, the predatory “vanity” operations. Now that’s a fight worth fighting, and educating people about.

  • bowerbird

    > The problem isn’t that it’s hard to sell self-published books.
    > The problem is that it’s hard to sell books. Period.

    wow. what insight. you just noticed this?


  • http://www.selfpublishingreview.com Henry Baum

    And you’re a prick, noticed that? Leave the internet.

    A little context for everyone else – bowerbird has a habit of spreading joy online:


  • http://willentrekin.com Will Entrekin

    “Unless you’re Dan Brown, or some other high-profile writer, most writers have to spend a whole lot of time marketing.”

    Wait, what? Are you saying Dan Brown doesn’t spend a whole lot of time marketing? I’d argue he does, or at least did; I am fairly certain his publisher booked him for a massive pre-publication tour of booksellers and bookstores several months prior to the publication of The Da Vinci Code. And no, doesn’t have to now, but that’s mainly because he set up such an astonishing foundation.

    It’s worth remembering his foundation, too; forgotten pseudonymous book before Digital Fortress and Angels & Demons, neither of which did . . . well, neither of which were The Da Vinci Code, obviously.

    Really, though, I think that focusing too much attention on selling books can be detrimental; really, we need to concentrate on writing the best books we can. I mean, sure, I hope people buy my book, I guess, but mostly I just want people to read the damned thing. Which they have; by the McSweeney’s standard you note, in fact, it’s been a smashing success so far, which is pleasing.

    It’s also worth noting McSweeney’s is really sort of self-publishing when you look at it. Eggers is the publisher, founder, editor, etc., and McSweeney’s publishes his books . . . I’m not saying it’s identical, but it’s certainly not far off. In fact, the first thing I thought of when I read about Backword Books was McSweeney’s. Which makes it interesting when the National Book Critics Circle recognizes Eggers’ books; they are, by many definitions, recognizing a self-published author. Just self-publishing with really good distribution, presence in a bookstore, and, well, hipster cache, really.

  • http://www.selfpublishingreview.com Henry Baum

    Obviously Dan Brown has to market – but not in the way other people market – groveling for attention through blogs, Twitter, etc. etc. He doesn’t have to claw as much for attention.

    McSweeney’s is technically a kind of self-publishing but the books are in Barnes & Noble, front and center. He’s in a different stratosphere, like Dan Brown.

  • bowerbird

    henry baum said:
    > And you’re a prick, noticed that? Leave the internet.

    ad hominem, anyone?

    look, i understand. you’re just another author who is
    trying to market his books by groveling for attention,
    through blogs, twitter, etc. etc., so you write this pap
    so you can append your credentials and your plugs,
    thereby reminding the audience one more time that
    you have a book for sale — look! my book, for sale! –
    but seriously, do you think a conclusion as weak as
    “it’s hard for everyone to sell their books these days”
    really _justifies_ a blog article? oh, sure, your little
    echo-chamber is going to tweet it — and retweet it –
    but is this drivel how you want to represent yourself?

    i mean, if it is, then fine… but gee, _really_?


  • http://www.selfpublishingreview.com Henry Baum

    I probably shouldn’t bother, but you bug me. That wasn’t ad hominem, these insults are pretty standard for you – in fact, all I’ve seen – so I think calling you a prick is relevant. You don’t get away with being a prick over and over again just because you make a point.

    This post builds on something I wrote earlier. Self-publishing is very often criticized for the fact that so few self-published books sell. What’s left out of this discussion is the difficulty of selling books across the spectrum, but self-publishing takes the brunt of the abuse.

    Here: http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/countering-the-myth-why-self-publishing-works/

  • bowerbird

    henry baum said:
    > That wasn’t ad hominem, these insults are pretty standard for you
    > – in fact, all I’ve seen – so I think calling you a prick is relevant.

    great. you reveal that you don’t even know what “ad hominem” means.

    if you want to argue against what i said, argue against what i said.
    throwing an insult at me personally does not counter the argument.

    > You don’t get away with being a prick over and over again
    > just because you make a point.

    and you don’t get away with being a prick by ignoring my point,
    even if you do it over and over again. and then do it some more.

    > This post builds on something I wrote earlier.

    oh, i see now. it took you _two_ posts to come to a conclusion
    that is so obvious that it didn’t even need to be made. gee, ok…

    listen up. this is how you’re representing yourself, henry baum.

    seriously, is this how you _want_ to be representing yourself?


  • http://www.selfpublishingreview.com Henry Baum

    I know exactly what ad hominem means. Cynicism is your M.O. Calling you out for that means I can disregard your point because you just spread hostility wherever you go. It’s not as if you’re making rational arguments and then I just threw in an insult to try and win the argument. The entire basis of your criticism is hostility. There’s a difference. Bullies hide behind ad hominem. That’s what you’re doing. Bullies also can’t take the same kind of criticism. Dish it but can’t take it.

    Is this how I want to be representing myself? Are you kidding me? The person who hides behind an anonymous name blindly spreading cynicism asks me that?

    Your points are not worth arguing against because they come from a place of such raw cynicism. Yes, part of the reason I posted this is to have a web presence online. Obviously. But I thought the Vroman’s post was interesting, so I devised a post around it. By you saying that my only motive is ambition shows that you’ve lost reason and replaced it with pure cynicism. There’s no point having a discussion with someone taking that pose.

    I knew by addressing this I was opening myself up for more crap from you, but your shit needs to be addressed.

  • bowerbird

    if i wanted to “hide behind an anonymous name” here,
    i woulda made one up. i wouldn’t use the same name
    i have used on a continuous basis for over 20 years,
    including the 14 years i’ve been active in cyberspace,
    discussing electronic publishing for that entire period.

    if i’ve been “hiding”, i have been doing a very poor job…

    and you make this abundantly clear to people when you
    say you’re familiar with my “m.o.” of course, you’re not.
    but that’s beside the point that it is fairly easy to find my
    comments on many e-book blogs, all over cyberspace.
    so, again, that just shows how bad i must be at “hiding”.

    > I knew by addressing this I was opening myself up for
    > more crap from you, but your shit needs to be addressed.

    well, at least you’ve dropped any pretense of a discussion of
    the point, and now openly admit you have made this about me.
    so hey, go ahead, take all the pot-shots you want to about me…
    i don’t even care if you spell my name right, because i don’t care
    about the publicity, because i’m not trying to sell anyone anything.

    oh, and stop e-mailing me too…


  • http://www.selfpublishingreview.com Henry Baum

    Discuss the point? I was pointing out the difficulty of selling books in light of self-publishing being repeatedly criticized about this as if it exists in a vacuum (http://howpublishingreallyworks.blogspot.com/2009/11/self-publishing-sales-statistics.html). I think that’s valid. You don’t. I don’t how much of a discussion I can have with someone who says, “Gee, great insight.”

    And dude, using an unclickable name online is hiding because you don’t have to be accountable for anything you say. You can spread as much bile as you like. Which is why I emailed you because it’s the only way you can be addressed directly.

  • bowerbird

    well, if i’m going to continue the conversation here,
    i will first have to clear up some bad misconceptions.

    first, henry baum paints me as “cynical”. i guess that
    he imagines me sitting at my computer here, scowling.

    what a laugh! i’m actually sitting here chuckling away!
    i’m having _fun_, folks, or i would be somewhere else!

    indeed, i would be laughing out loud, not just chuckling,
    except there’s something sad about the limp impotence
    being offered up by henry baum, and it’d be cruel to laugh
    at something so pathetic. but a mere chuckle is alright. :+)

    and lest someone indict me for dragging in penis humor,
    let me point out that you, henry, started it, by calling me
    “a prick”. which i would say connotes “hard and sharp”…


    your conclusion — that it’s difficult for _everyone_
    to sell books these days, including the big houses
    – is obvious. that was my point, which you ignore.

    i didn’t ignore your point. i discussed it, as fully as
    it _can_ be discussed, when i said it is _obvious_.
    (it’s not a very long discussion, true, but it’s enough.)

    you’ve said nothing that people didn’t already know.
    so there wasn’t really any reason to say it _at_all_…

    but if you really want to discuss aspects of the issue,
    i can turn it into something actually worth discussing…

    because when big houses talk about a book they publish
    “not selling”, they mean that it sold 5,000 copies, or less.
    that is, it failed to “recoup”, or earn out the advance paid.

    whereas 5,000 copies for a self-publisher would be great.

    so even though the words we use happen to be the same,
    when you get down to specifics, the situations are _not_…

    furthermore, big houses generally put physical copies in
    brick-and-mortar bookstores. self-publishers? mostly not.

    thus the big-house books at least have a _chance_ to sell
    in larger numbers, even if most of ‘em don’t actually do so.
    that is what most people are talking about — that _chance_…

    whereas only a sliver of a percentage of self-published books
    will generally be able to capitalize on _any_ chance to sell big,
    mostly because very few will even be carried in bookstores…

    nor will they be reviewed in the big newspapers or magazines,
    because those outlets are owned by the same corporations who
    own the big publishing houses, and they scratch their own back.

    moreover, the big houses are excellent at placing their books
    in _libraries_ across the country, based solely on their imprint.
    this means that even if your own library doesn’t have your book,
    they can order it via interlibrary-loan from _some_ other library,
    and this can be a very important consideration for some writers,
    since their history dating to childhood has fond library memories.

    finally, if your book was published by a big house, the odds are
    that it has an agent attached to it as well, and the combination of
    those two things means it will be much more likely to be pitched
    for ancillary purposes, such as commercial tie-ins, film deals, etc.

    and if a big-house book _does_ get picked up for that, the numbers
    on the contract will be much bigger than for a self-published book,
    because the book will be seen as already having a stamp of quality.

    now, are all these “advantages” really “worth it” when you factor in
    that subjecting your book to control by a big publishing house means
    that your corporate overlords are gonna rip you off like a drunk tourist?

    i can’t say, and neither can anyone else. each author will have to
    make that decision for themselves personally. but at least if they
    factor in all of the considerations that i’ve listed here, they will be
    much better prepared to answer the question than if they had merely
    listened to henry baum tell ‘em that “it’s hard out there for everyone”.

    i believe in self-publishing myself. i hate the corporate publishers.
    i wish they’d die. i have promoted d.i.y. ever since the punk days.
    in my opinion, any writer is a fool to sign with a big house now, but
    i want writers to make educated decisions about how they proceed.
    and that means i call b.s. on simplistic “analyses” like this blog here.

    so there you go, henry baum. i’ve turned your hum-drum topic into
    something actually worth talking about, except you will have nothing
    of value to add, because i covered most of the waterfront right there,
    while you cannot rationally discuss your way out of a wet paper bag…


  • http://www.selfpublishingreview.com Henry Baum

    I started it? First, that’s infantile. Second, read your first comment.

    If you bothered to read my 3:AM piece, you’d see I say that traditional publishing has significant advantages, as I have on this site in the past. Instead you said, “oh, i see now. it took you _two_ posts to come to a conclusion
    that is so obvious that it didn’t even need to be made.” I don’t care if you’re laughing maniacally as you’re writing it, it’s still cynical and too quick to be dismissive.

order bactrim overnight viagra 100mg fta 12 generic viagra typepad xenical china online price kamagra 100 mg generic viagra 26 cialis celebrex 200 mg contraindicaciones metformin denk 850 mg comanda online cialis generic cialis acne online pharmacy zovirax lexapro 5 mg therapeutic 40 mg of lexapro lisinopril online metformin 1000 mg pills glucophage tabletas 500 mg cheapest xenical australia zoloft 50 mg yahoo viagra online rischi cheap viagra rupees 250mg viagra 20 mg generic levitra vand kamagra online valtrex 500mg posologia cheap gerne cialis nexium 40 mg high purchase cialis 40mg propecia mastercard orders nolvadex 10 mg ginecomastia erythromycin 500 mg iv zoloft 100mg nebenwirkungen clomid generic prescription existe viagra generico cipro xr online cialis 25 mg xenical 120 mg upotreba gbl viagra order cialis 5 mg venta propecia 1 mg generic zovirax 50 mg bula buy cialis softtabs dirt cheap viagra propecia 5mg review clomid 50mg pregnant viagra online discrete zoloft 50 mg erfahrungsberichte funziona cialis generico buy viagra 2.5mg rischi viagra online strattera generic form bactrim 400 80 mg tablet lexapro 5mg success generic of xenical online kamagra maestro cialis 5 mg results prednisone oral 50 mg buy Cialis 60 wholesale viagra buyer buy prednisone without wellbutrin xl 150 mg zoloft 50 mg indications lisinopril 10 mg without 10mg lexapro costco taking 2 10mg cialis generic cialis shiper doxycycline 100mg reactions confezione viagra 100 mg beli cialis 20 mg cheapviagrageneric viagra propecia generic wiki generic cheap cialis 2.5 cialis 20mg uzivanie generic lexapro celexa bula levitra 10mg buy propecia prescription 10 mg prednisone tablets cipro 500mg india generic viagra pfizer generic lisinopril dangers lexapro mg doses zovirax sirop 5mg prednisone 5 mg dosage avis generic cialis cialis europe online viagra generico nexium 40 mg annostus beipackzettel levitra 20mg buy viagra sydney buy doxycycline antimalarial nexium 2.5mg cialis 10 mg n1 cialis danger 75 mg lexapro online canada valtrex 500 mg shingles phenergan promethazine 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg usos viagra generic 25 mg cialis 2 5 mg prezzo buy real propecia online viagra apotheke viagra 25 mg tabletki clomid online kopen buy liquid clomid levitra order generic celebrex 200 mg uk lexapro tabletas 20 mg cialis wieviel mg 30 mg prednisone prednisone buy canada metformin generic form cialis generic version levitra wiki mg hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg walmart prednisone 10mg injector generic zovirax online zovirax 50 mg celebrex 200mg wirkung splitting cialis 20 mg zithromax 20 mg kg generic cialis mfgs kamagra online jelly propecia yahoo buy nexium 20mg 40mg cialis 50 mg instructions cialis 5mg therapie cipro 500 mg kullananlar exporters generic viagra viagra online barato get cheap viagra online viagra test zithromax pill online periactin 2 mg buy bactrim cream 50 mg prednisone withdrawal online viagra mumbai online nexium cheap kamagra cheap nl teva prednisone 5mg cheapest viagra 25mg viagra pricing 50 mg doxycycline dosage 40 mg wellbutrin 300 mg bijwerkingen discount online viagra cialis generico venezuela generic viagra details penggunaan cialis 50mg lisinopril generic recall viagra de 500 mg zithromax 50mg feline viagra rezept online prednisone 5mg fatigue kamagra online shop generic red viagra abra generic viagra zoloft order prozac levitra generique 20mg levitra 20 mg priceing lexapro generic side prednisone arrow 5 mg 100mg of doxycycline lasix online purchase buy unprescribed viagra periactin 8mg walgreens generic viagra generic wellbutrin costs propranolol hcl 60 mg cyproheptadine generic periactin buy brand levitra lisinopril 20 mg forums wellbutrin generic canada buy viagra dropship synthroid buy cheap xenical 42 cap 120 mg diflucan 150 mg compresse 6 mg zoloft norethisterone 5mg clomid cheaper than cialis amoxil 500 mg uti nolvadex online cheap nexium generic alternative cialis 5mg gener alli orlistat 60mg buy synthroid levothyroxine cheap levitra 10mg cialis 20mg ftbl levitra 20 mg facts prednisone 10mg pack 32 propranolol sa 120 mg viagra 100 mg ervaringen legitimate cialis online generic cialis switzerland buy zoloft without nexium 40 mg propiedades cortancyl 5 mg prednisone canada viagra order erythromycin 250 mg capsules kamagra tablets 100mg celebrex 200 mg ulotka buy amoxil uk strattera 10 mg cena generico do synthroid lasix retard buy prednisone 1mg metformin 500 mg tb24 doxycycline 100mg eyes diflucan online kaufen augmentin 500mg tabs cialis 20 mg identification viagra online sverige metformin 500 mg fertility levitra 20 mg n3 generic diflucan 150 mg 25 mgs of cialis nexium 40 mg treatment diflucan nombre generico erfahrungsberichte viagra online lisinopril 20 mg eon propranolol 10 mg pl bactrim forte 480 mg wirkung viagra 50 mg review generic viagra doxycycline generic dosage lisinopril 10 mg medicamento generic cialis generic metformin online viagra online australia. cialis usa buy levitra ftbl 10mg buy viagra condom metformin 500 mg forum buy diflucan 10 mg order levitra cheap wellbutrin teva generic lisinopril 40 mg overdose clorhidrato propranolol 40 mg indicacion cialis 5mg nolvadex 25mg fake cialis 5 mg filmtabletta clomid buying nz buy metformin online generic zovirax herpes diflucan 150 mg prospecto bronchitis 10mg prednisone cipro xr 750mg mexico buy viagra name generic cialis glucophage 500 mg daily cialis pro generic diflucan 150 mg uti buy levitra super levitra original 10mg generic cialis 20 online diflucan 50 mg kapselit zovirax pills 400 mg augmentin duo buy comprimes cialis 5mg metformin er generic buy lasix 100 mg wirkung viagra 25mg order viagra dubai 150 mg clomid ovulation viagra 25 mg tablet clomid nombre generico erythromycin 500mg price nolvadex 40mg levitra 5 mg prezzo viagra generic4all pfizer zithromax 500mg buy xenical reviews nexium 40mg ndc diflucan 2oo mg phenergan 12.5 mg iv viagra genericcanada cheap viagra order cialis 20mg norwegia cheap nexium canada erythromycin 500 mg filmtabletten cheap cialis information generic cipro 500 mg tab erythromycin 500 mg viagra dose 120 mg lasix 40 mg iv cipro 750 mg generic cialis 100mg preis cialis 20mg lloyds vaistai nexium 20mg prednisone cost 20mg generico viagra nomes zovirax online uk augmentin duo 1000 mg buy cialis in 10 mg of phenergan 10 mg tablets lexapro cialis 5mg 1 box nexium 20mg tablets prospecto cialis 40 mg bactrim 875 mg zoloft 30mg generic synthroid levitra generique 10mg pfizer viagra online generic dapoxetine buy cialis switzerland viagra 50mg valor levitra 20 mg efectos purchase augmentin online metformin 500 mg prospect 100 mg cialis tadalafil diflucan 100 mg costs metformin 500 mg sa doxycycline 100mg hond levitra 10 mg paypal effetti cialis 20 mg viagra generic mexico 600 mg of wellbutrin celebrex 200mg ibuprofen efek cialis 20 mg generic substitute strattera get wellbutrin online buy legitimate viagra 50 mg viagra cheap teva wellbutrin generic cheapests priced cialis doxycycline 260 mg propecia generic 2013 price generic lexapro coming wellbutrin generic complaints levitra 10mg cialis 25 mg turkey cialis 20 mg portugal amoxil 125 mg 1.25 ml natural viagra order generic wellbutrin gluten viagra ireland online 100mg viagra street prednisone 1 mg otc bestellen viagra online viagra online compare nexium packets 40 mg viagra online beziehen glucophage generic name counterfeit cialis 200mg generic levitra 40mg generic cialis legitimate cipro 750 mg bid viagra 100mg indien buy cialis batam viagra generic march 2012 nyari viagra 50mg zovirax 200 mg posologia generic kamagra 100mg prezzi cialis 10 mg cialis lily online lexapro 10mg teva bula propranolol 10mg zoloft online propranolol 10mg genericos de lisinopril clomid 100mg cd29 generic cialis reviews lexapro 10 mg pharmacy valtrex generic reviews generico viagra andorra prednisone 5 mg instructions 3 5mg of cialis metformin 500 mg schwangerschaft cialis 20 or 40mg cheap herbal levitra pregnant 50 mg clomid valtrex prescription online cialis 20 mg wikipedia levitra buy discount metformin ratiopharm 850 mg lisinopril eg 5 mg levitra 20mg doctissimo lexapro 40mg cost buy xenical aus cialis order viagra medicijn nexium 40mg lasix tabletten 40 mg 25 mg doxycycline lexapro generic equivalent cialis pills cheap cheap cialis forum zithromax 500mg italy prednisone tab 50mg cheap 50 mg viagra cipro xr 1mg 10 mg prednisone ivf levitra online brand 2 25mg viagra doxycycline kegunaan 50 mg doxycycline buy canada generic lexapro 2012 walmart viagra 150 mg france buy erythromycin 500mg cialis 5mg instead viagra 25mg flashback viagra as generic cialis cheap canadian drugstore cialis 40 mg viagra 2011 online buy amoxil 250mg buy amoxicillin augmentin augmentin 1000 mg nebenwirkungen prednisone 20 mg 12 days synthroid cheap price online 5 mg levitra buy viagra montreal buy viagra 2 days zoloft 50 mg rcp viagra 150mg topix zovirax 800 mg tablet buy 10 mg. cialis buy lisinopril 40 mg buy tescos viagra american nolvadex 25 mg genericall cialis canada cialis order generic viagra deutschland nolvadex 20mg buy buy kamagra leeds buy strattera 40 mg canadian viagra 150 mg levitra orodispersibile generico cialis 40 mg safe male order cialis generic dapoxetine buy buy metformin tablets levitra 20 mg kullanimi lasix dosage generic viagra online rpsgb online viagra perscriptions cheap levitra a zovirax 5mg cream prednisone 10 mg pill female kamagra 100mg order viagra man clomid online 2011 viagra 25 mg dosage cheap nexium online viagra brasil online viagra online thread eon generic wellbutrin nolvadex 60mg start lisinopril 2.5mg cough 100mg kamagra reviews taking 150 mg clomid antidepresivo lexapro 10 mg generic wellbutrin 101 viagra online help cialis generics cheap levitra generics24 viagra pro 100 mg strattera 40 mg cost generic viagra levitra doxycycline 100 mg msds viagra online deutchland metformin 500 mg bernofarm prednisone 50 mg alcohol levitra de 40 mg prednisone dosage 5mg dog prednisone 5 mg cialis 40mg cipla amoxil suspension buy taking 25 mg zoloft harga levitra 20 mg viagra usa 800 mg generic viagra jakarta wellbutrin 450 mg lisinopril 10 mg ingredients cialis 2.5 mg canada valtrex 500 mg glaxosmithkline buy lexapro drug online viagra 25mg metformin 500 mg dosierung order viagra 25mg bijsluiter cialis 20mg zovirax tablets buy dosage generic cialis 250mg of viagra cytotec tab 200 mg effetti cialis 10 mg prednisone 10mg colitis cheapest lexapro online lexapro generic alternative buy prednisone 20mg buy erythromycin suspension cheapest cialis 10mg zoloft 100mg dosage cialis 40 mg hrvatska glucophage 500 mg nebenwirkungen cialis 20 mg drunk tesco buy viagra viagra generico europa generic bactrim 200 mg about zoloft 50mg levitra pills 10mg cheapest propecia generic 360